GTA:Marking & Feedback: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=== Essential Resources === | === Essential Resources === | ||
* | * FSE GTA Hub: https://www.staffnet.manchester.ac.uk/fse/teaching-college/teaching-academy/gtahub/ | ||
* | * GTA General Information: https://www.staffnet.manchester.ac.uk/people/current-staff/gtas/ | ||
* | * University Policy on Marking: Contact Course Unit Lead for latest version | ||
* | * Dignity at Work Policy: https://www.staffnet.manchester.ac.uk/equality-and-diversity/policies-and-guidance/dignity-at-work-and-study/ | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== Before You Start Marking == | == Before You Start Marking == | ||
=== Complete Mandatory Training === | === Complete Mandatory Training === | ||
* ✓ You | * ✓ You MUST complete FSESS8202 Marking and Feedback training before undertaking any marking activity | ||
* ✓ Ensure you have completed all other mandatory GTA training modules | * ✓ Ensure you have completed all other mandatory GTA training modules | ||
* ✓ Attend any unit-specific marking briefings or calibration sessions | * ✓ Attend any unit-specific marking briefings or calibration sessions | ||
=== Understand the Assessment === | === Understand the Assessment === | ||
* | * Read the assignment brief thoroughly – understand what students were asked to do | ||
* | * Study the marking scheme/rubric in detail – know exactly what each grade band represents | ||
* | * Review exemplar work if provided by the Course Unit Lead | ||
* | * Clarify any uncertainties with the Course Unit Lead before you begin marking | ||
* | * Discuss the rubric with fellow GTAs to ensure consistent understanding | ||
* | * Check submission deadlines and be aware of any students with approved extensions | ||
=== Prepare Your Workspace === | === Prepare Your Workspace === | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Additional preparation: | Additional preparation: | ||
* Set aside | * Set aside uninterrupted time for marking to maintain consistency | ||
* Have a | * Have a clear system for tracking which submissions you've marked | ||
== Understanding Marking Schemes & Rubrics == | == Understanding Marking Schemes & Rubrics == | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
=== What Is a Marking Scheme? === | === What Is a Marking Scheme? === | ||
A marking scheme (also called a rubric) is a structured guide that: | A marking scheme (also called a rubric) is a structured guide that: | ||
* Defines the | * Defines the assessment criteria for the work | ||
* Shows how | * Shows how marks are allocated across different elements | ||
* Describes what constitutes | * Describes what constitutes different quality levels of work (e.g., what distinguishes a First from a 2:1) | ||
=== How to Use the Marking Scheme Effectively === | === How to Use the Marking Scheme Effectively === | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
==== 1. Study It Thoroughly ==== | ==== 1. Study It Thoroughly ==== | ||
* Read through the entire scheme before marking any work | * Read through the entire scheme before marking any work | ||
* Note the | * Note the weighting of different sections or criteria | ||
* Understand the | * Understand the descriptors for each grade band | ||
* Identify any areas where | * Identify any areas where professional judgement is required | ||
==== 2. Apply It Consistently ==== | ==== 2. Apply It Consistently ==== | ||
* Use the | * Use the same standards for all students | ||
* Mark | * Mark to the rubric, not to your personal preferences | ||
* Be | * Be objective – your personal opinion of the topic is irrelevant | ||
* | * Don't compare students to each other; compare their work to the criteria | ||
==== 3. Calibrate With Others ==== | ==== 3. Calibrate With Others ==== | ||
* Discuss interpretation of the rubric with other GTAs | * Discuss interpretation of the rubric with other GTAs | ||
* If possible, | * If possible, independently mark a sample submission, then compare marks | ||
* Resolve any discrepancies in understanding with the Course Unit Lead | * Resolve any discrepancies in understanding with the Course Unit Lead | ||
* This ensures | * This ensures consistency across all markers | ||
==== 4. Document Your Decisions ==== | ==== 4. Document Your Decisions ==== | ||
* Make | * Make brief notes about why you awarded specific marks | ||
* This helps if you need to justify marks later | * This helps if you need to justify marks later | ||
* It also helps you maintain consistency across all submissions | * It also helps you maintain consistency across all submissions | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
==== Start With a Sample ==== | ==== Start With a Sample ==== | ||
* | * Mark 2-3 submissions first to calibrate your marking | ||
* Check these with the Course Unit Lead if possible | * Check these with the Course Unit Lead if possible | ||
* This helps you understand the | * This helps you understand the range of quality you'll encounter | ||
* Adjust your approach if needed before continuing | * Adjust your approach if needed before continuing | ||
==== Work Systematically ==== | ==== Work Systematically ==== | ||
* | * Mark in batches to maintain consistency | ||
* Take | * Take regular breaks to avoid marker fatigue | ||
* | * Don't rush – quality and fairness are paramount | ||
* If you're unsure about a mark, | * If you're unsure about a mark, flag it and ask the Course Unit Lead | ||
==== Apply Criteria Fairly ==== | ==== Apply Criteria Fairly ==== | ||
* | * Every student receives the same careful attention | ||
* | * Don't show favouritism or mark down students you recognise | ||
* | * Ignore names if possible (some systems allow anonymous marking) | ||
* Be particularly careful to avoid | * Be particularly careful to avoid unconscious bias | ||
==== Handle Edge Cases ==== | ==== Handle Edge Cases ==== | ||
* If a submission is | * If a submission is unclear or incomplete, don't assume – mark what's there | ||
* For | * For suspected plagiarism or cheating, assign a mark but report to Course Unit Lead immediately | ||
* For | * For late submissions without extensions, mark these, late submissions are taken care of separately | ||
* For | * For missing submissions, leave the mark blank (don't enter zero) – student may have special circumstances | ||
== Providing High-Quality Feedback == | == Providing High-Quality Feedback == | ||
| Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
=== Why Feedback Matters === | === Why Feedback Matters === | ||
Good feedback: | Good feedback: | ||
* Helps students | * Helps students understand their performance | ||
* Identifies | * Identifies strengths in their work | ||
* Highlights | * Highlights areas for improvement | ||
* Guides students on | * Guides students on how to improve in future assessments | ||
* Is a | * Is a legal requirement under University policy | ||
=== Principles of Effective Feedback === | === Principles of Effective Feedback === | ||
==== 1. Be Constructive ==== | ==== 1. Be Constructive ==== | ||
* ✓ | * ✓ DO: "Your analysis of the data was thorough, but consider discussing the limitations of your methodology to strengthen future work." | ||
* ✗ | * ✗ DON'T: "This analysis is weak." | ||
==== 2. Be Specific ==== | ==== 2. Be Specific ==== | ||
* ✓ | * ✓ DO: "Your introduction clearly states the research question, but could benefit from more context about why this question matters in the field." | ||
* ✗ | * ✗ DON'T: "Introduction needs work." | ||
==== 3. Balance Positive and Developmental Comments ==== | ==== 3. Balance Positive and Developmental Comments ==== | ||
* | * Highlight strengths as well as areas for improvement | ||
* Start with | * Start with positive observations where genuine | ||
* Frame criticism as | * Frame criticism as opportunities for development | ||
* Example: "You've demonstrated strong understanding of X. To develop further, consider exploring Y in more depth." | * Example: "You've demonstrated strong understanding of X. To develop further, consider exploring Y in more depth." | ||
==== 4. Be Clear and Actionable ==== | ==== 4. Be Clear and Actionable ==== | ||
* ✓ | * ✓ DO: "Include more recent sources (published within the last 5 years) to strengthen your literature review." | ||
* ✗ | * ✗ DON'T: "Literature review could be better." | ||
==== 5. Link Feedback to Criteria ==== | ==== 5. Link Feedback to Criteria ==== | ||
* Explicitly reference the | * Explicitly reference the marking criteria in your feedback | ||
* Help students understand | * Help students understand why they achieved particular marks | ||
* Example: "This section scored 15/20 because whilst the theoretical framework is sound (meeting criterion 2), the application to the case study could be more detailed (criterion 3)." | * Example: "This section scored 15/20 because whilst the theoretical framework is sound (meeting criterion 2), the application to the case study could be more detailed (criterion 3)." | ||
| Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
==== Written Comments ==== | ==== Written Comments ==== | ||
* Provide feedback | * Provide feedback directly on Blackboard or as instructed by Course Unit Lead | ||
* Use | * Use professional language – remember this is an official University document | ||
* Check your | * Check your spelling and grammar – poor writing undermines your credibility | ||
* Be | * Be respectful and encouraging in tone | ||
* Aim for | * Aim for 150-300 words of general feedback (unless told otherwise) | ||
==== Rubric Marking ==== | ==== Rubric Marking ==== | ||
Many units use | Many units use structured rubrics with predefined criteria and grade descriptors. | ||
Rubric-based feedback provides | Rubric-based feedback provides clear, criterion-referenced comments for each assessment area: | ||
* | * Select the appropriate descriptor for each criterion based on the student's performance | ||
* Add | * Add brief personalised comments within each criterion to explain your selection | ||
Benefits of rubric marking: | |||
* Ensures | * Ensures consistency across all students | ||
* Makes your | * Makes your marking process transparent to students | ||
* Helps students understand | * Helps students understand exactly where they met/missed criteria | ||
* Reduces | * Reduces marking time whilst maintaining quality feedback | ||
How to use rubrics effectively: | |||
* Review | * Review all criteria before starting to mark | ||
* Mark | * Mark each criterion independently – don't let performance in one area bias another | ||
* Use the | * Use the full range of descriptors available (don't cluster all marks in the middle) | ||
* Add | * Add personalised comments even when using standard descriptors (e.g., "You've demonstrated strong critical analysis here, particularly in your evaluation of Source X") | ||
* Ensure your | * Ensure your overall comments align with the rubric scores selected | ||
Common pitfall: | |||
* Don't just tick boxes without explanation – students benefit from understanding | * Don't just tick boxes without explanation – students benefit from understanding why they achieved each level | ||
==== Marginal Comments ==== | ==== Marginal Comments ==== | ||
* Add | * Add brief annotations within the work where appropriate | ||
* Highlight | * Highlight specific examples of good practice or errors | ||
* Use these to | * Use these to support your general comments | ||
* Don't overload the work with comments – focus on the most important points | * Don't overload the work with comments – focus on the most important points | ||
==== Feed-Forward ==== | ==== Feed-Forward ==== | ||
* Where possible, include | * Where possible, include advice for future assessments | ||
* Suggest | * Suggest specific strategies for improvement | ||
* Direct students to | * Direct students to relevant resources if appropriate | ||
* Example: "For your next submission, review the University Academic Phrasebank to strengthen your academic writing style." | * Example: "For your next submission, review the University Academic Phrasebank to strengthen your academic writing style." | ||
| Line 186: | Line 186: | ||
=== GTAs Do NOT Have Sole Responsibility === | === GTAs Do NOT Have Sole Responsibility === | ||
* | * All marking by GTAs must be second-marked or moderated by the Course Unit Lead | ||
* This is a | * This is a University policy requirement | ||
* You are | * You are contributing to the assessment process, not making final decisions | ||
=== The Moderation Process === | === The Moderation Process === | ||
# | # You mark the work according to the rubric | ||
# | # Enter provisional marks on Canvas | ||
# | # Course Unit Lead reviews a sample or all of your marking | ||
# | # Marks may be adjusted to ensure consistency and standards | ||
# | # Final marks are confirmed by the Course Unit Lead | ||
=== If Your Marks Are Adjusted === | === If Your Marks Are Adjusted === | ||
* This is | * This is normal and part of quality assurance | ||
* It's an opportunity to | * It's an opportunity to learn and develop your marking skills | ||
* Ask for | * Ask for feedback on your marking from the Course Unit Lead | ||
* Use this to | * Use this to improve consistency in future marking | ||
* Don't take it personally – the goal is | * Don't take it personally – the goal is fairness for students | ||
== Common Marking Challenges & Solutions == | == Common Marking Challenges & Solutions == | ||
=== Challenge: Inconsistent Quality Within One Submission === | === Challenge: Inconsistent Quality Within One Submission === | ||
Solution: Mark each section against its specific criteria. A submission can score well in some areas and poorly in others. Your overall mark should reflect the marking scheme's weighting. | |||
=== Challenge: Work That Doesn't Fit Neatly Into Grade Bands === | === Challenge: Work That Doesn't Fit Neatly Into Grade Bands === | ||
Solution: Use your professional judgement to place the work in the most appropriate band, then use the mark range within that band to fine-tune. Discuss borderline cases with the Course Unit Lead. | |||
=== Challenge: Difficulty Reading or Understanding the Submission === | === Challenge: Difficulty Reading or Understanding the Submission === | ||
Solution: Mark what is clearly communicated. Poor presentation or unclear writing is part of the assessment. If genuinely illegible, consult the Course Unit Lead. | |||
=== Challenge: Marker Fatigue === | === Challenge: Marker Fatigue === | ||
Solution: | |||
* Take | * Take regular breaks (e.g., after every 5 submissions) | ||
* Don't try to mark too many in one session | * Don't try to mark too many in one session | ||
* | * Revisit your first few marks after a break to check consistency | ||
* If you feel your concentration slipping, | * If you feel your concentration slipping, stop and resume later | ||
=== Challenge: Emotional Responses to Student Work === | === Challenge: Emotional Responses to Student Work === | ||
Solution: | |||
* Remain | * Remain objective – you're marking the work, not the student | ||
* If you feel too emotionally affected (e.g., by distressing content), | * If you feel too emotionally affected (e.g., by distressing content), stop marking and consult the Course Unit Lead | ||
* Your wellbeing matters too | * Your wellbeing matters too | ||
=== Challenge: Time Management === | === Challenge: Time Management === | ||
Solution: | |||
* Estimate | * Estimate time per submission based on your allocation | ||
* If you're taking significantly longer than expected, | * If you're taking significantly longer than expected, discuss with Course Unit Lead – you may need guidance or the rubric may need clarifying | ||
* | * Claim all hours worked – don't work unpaid | ||
== What GTAs Should NOT Do == | == What GTAs Should NOT Do == | ||
=== Set Summative Assessments === | === Set Summative Assessments === | ||
GTAs must | GTAs must never be asked to write or set assessments that contribute to final marks. | ||
=== Have Sole Marking Responsibility === | === Have Sole Marking Responsibility === | ||
All GTA marking | All GTA marking must be overseen, second-marked, or moderated by the Course Unit Lead. | ||
=== Be the Point of Contact for Marks Disputes === | === Be the Point of Contact for Marks Disputes === | ||
Students questioning marks should contact the | Students questioning marks should contact the Course Unit Lead, not GTAs. Direct any such queries immediately to the Course Unit Lead. | ||
=== Show Students the Marking Scheme (If Confidential) === | === Show Students the Marking Scheme (If Confidential) === | ||
If the detailed marking scheme is not released to students, | If the detailed marking scheme is not released to students, do not share it. You can discuss general assessment criteria. | ||
=== Show Students Other Students' Marks === | === Show Students Other Students' Marks === | ||
Never disclose another student's performance or marks. This breaches confidentiality and GDPR. | |||
=== Discuss Suspected Academic Misconduct With Students === | === Discuss Suspected Academic Misconduct With Students === | ||
If you suspect | If you suspect plagiarism, cheating, or collusion, report it to the Course Unit Lead immediately. Do not confront the student or discuss it with them. | ||
=== Mark Work From Students on Your Own Programme === | === Mark Work From Students on Your Own Programme === | ||
You | You cannot mark work from modules that contribute to a programme on which you are enrolled. | ||
=== Provide Pastoral Care === | === Provide Pastoral Care === | ||
GTAs are | GTAs are not responsible for pastoral support. If a student raises personal issues: | ||
* Be | * Be empathetic but don't try to counsel them | ||
* | * Direct them to appropriate support services | ||
* | * Inform the Course Unit Lead if appropriate | ||
== Entering Marks & Record Keeping == | == Entering Marks & Record Keeping == | ||
=== Using Canvas === | === Using Canvas === | ||
* | * Enter marks promptly as instructed by the Course Unit Lead | ||
* | * Double-check you've entered the mark in the correct field | ||
* | * Save your feedback before moving to the next submission | ||
* Keep a | * Keep a backup record of marks (e.g., in a spreadsheet) until moderation is complete | ||
=== Recording Your Time === | === Recording Your Time === | ||
Track all marking time including: | |||
* Reading submissions | * Reading submissions | ||
* Applying the rubric | * Applying the rubric | ||
| Line 279: | Line 279: | ||
* Any required meetings or calibration sessions | * Any required meetings or calibration sessions | ||
Important: | |||
* | * Declare hours monthly in the GTA portal, even if zero | ||
* If marking takes significantly longer than allocated, | * If marking takes significantly longer than allocated, discuss with Course Unit Lead | ||
=== Deadlines === | === Deadlines === | ||
* | * Respect marking deadlines – delays affect students and teaching staff | ||
* If you cannot meet a deadline, | * If you cannot meet a deadline, notify the Course Unit Lead immediately (as far in advance as possible) | ||
* Build in | * Build in buffer time for unexpected issues | ||
== Academic Integrity & Misconduct == | == Academic Integrity & Misconduct == | ||
| Line 293: | Line 293: | ||
==== Plagiarism Warning Signs ==== | ==== Plagiarism Warning Signs ==== | ||
* Sudden changes in | * Sudden changes in writing style or quality within a submission | ||
* Text that seems | * Text that seems too advanced for the level | ||
* | * Inconsistent referencing or missing citations | ||
* Content that doesn't address the | * Content that doesn't address the specific assignment brief | ||
==== Collusion Warning Signs ==== | ==== Collusion Warning Signs ==== | ||
* | * Identical or near-identical submissions from multiple students | ||
* Same | * Same unusual errors or phrasing across multiple submissions | ||
=== What To Do If You Suspect Misconduct === | === What To Do If You Suspect Misconduct === | ||
# | # Keep marking the submission | ||
# | # Document what you've observed | ||
# | # Contact the Course Unit Lead immediately | ||
# | # Do assign a mark | ||
# | # Do not discuss with the student | ||
# Let the University's | # Let the University's formal procedures handle it | ||
=== Your Responsibilities === | === Your Responsibilities === | ||
* | * Maintain confidentiality about any suspected cases | ||
* | * Follow University procedures exactly | ||
* Remember: your role is to | * Remember: your role is to report suspicions, not to investigate or adjudicate | ||
== Maintaining Professionalism == | == Maintaining Professionalism == | ||
=== Professional Standards === | === Professional Standards === | ||
* ✓ | * ✓ Mark impartially and without bias | ||
* ✓ | * ✓ Respect confidentiality – never discuss individual students' work inappropriately | ||
* ✓ | * ✓ Meet deadlines and commitments | ||
* ✓ | * ✓ Communicate professionally in all written feedback | ||
* ✓ | * ✓ Maintain appropriate boundaries with students | ||
* ✓ | * ✓ Seek support when needed | ||
=== Avoiding Bias === | === Avoiding Bias === | ||
Be aware of | Be aware of unconscious bias related to: | ||
* Names suggesting gender, ethnicity, or nationality | * Names suggesting gender, ethnicity, or nationality | ||
* Writing style or accent in written English | * Writing style or accent in written English | ||
* Topics that align or conflict with your personal views | * Topics that align or conflict with your personal views | ||
Key points: | |||
* If you find yourself with | * If you find yourself with strong emotional reactions to a student's work, pause and consider whether bias might affect your marking | ||
* Remember: you're marking | * Remember: you're marking the work against criteria, not expressing personal agreement or disagreement | ||
=== Self-Care === | === Self-Care === | ||
* Marking can be | * Marking can be mentally demanding – take care of yourself | ||
* If you encounter | * If you encounter distressing content (e.g., in creative writing or case studies), take breaks and seek support | ||
* Don't let marking | * Don't let marking consume excessive time – if it's taking too long, get help | ||
* Remember your | * Remember your primary role is as a researcher – don't let marking harm your PhD progress | ||
== Getting Help & Support == | == Getting Help & Support == | ||
=== When to Ask for Help === | === When to Ask for Help === | ||
* You're | * You're unsure how to interpret the marking scheme | ||
* You encounter a | * You encounter a borderline or unusual submission | ||
* You suspect | * You suspect academic misconduct | ||
* Marking is taking | * Marking is taking significantly longer than allocated time | ||
* You're | * You're struggling with the workload | ||
* You have | * You have concerns about bias or fairness | ||
* A student has | * A student has contacted you about their mark | ||
=== Who to Contact === | === Who to Contact === | ||
==== First: Course Unit Lead ==== | ==== First: Course Unit Lead ==== | ||
Your | Your primary contact for all marking-related questions: | ||
* Clarification on marking schemes | * Clarification on marking schemes | ||
* Guidance on difficult submissions | * Guidance on difficult submissions | ||
| Line 376: | Line 376: | ||
=== University Policy on Marking === | === University Policy on Marking === | ||
* GTAs must have | * GTAs must have appropriate training before marking | ||
* All GTA marking must be | * All GTA marking must be overseen by Course Unit Lead | ||
* Marks must be | * Marks must be awarded according to published criteria | ||
* | * Feedback must be provided to students | ||
* | * Moderation/second-marking is required | ||
=== Data Protection & GDPR === | === Data Protection & GDPR === | ||
* Student marks and work are | * Student marks and work are confidential | ||
* | * Never share student data inappropriately | ||
* | * Secure any student work you handle | ||
* | * Follow University protocols for data handling | ||
* Refer to Information Security & Data Protection training | * Refer to Information Security & Data Protection training | ||
=== Special Circumstances === | === Special Circumstances === | ||
* Students may have | * Students may have approved extensions | ||
* Some students have | * Some students have learning support plans (you may not be told details) | ||
* | * Late submissions without extensions should not normally be marked without Course Unit Lead instruction | ||
* | * Missing submissions: enter no mark (leave blank) rather than zero | ||
== Quick Checklist: Before Submitting Marks == | == Quick Checklist: Before Submitting Marks == | ||
| Line 413: | Line 413: | ||
=== Marking Is a Professional Activity === | === Marking Is a Professional Activity === | ||
* Your marking | * Your marking directly affects students' outcomes | ||
* Take it seriously and | * Take it seriously and maintain high standards | ||
* Your | * Your fairness and consistency matter enormously | ||
=== You're Part of a Team === | === You're Part of a Team === | ||
* | * You're not alone – the Course Unit Lead oversees all marking | ||
* | * Ask questions – it's better to check than to mark incorrectly | ||
* | * Learn from feedback on your marking | ||
=== Balance Your Commitments === | === Balance Your Commitments === | ||
* Your | * Your PhD is your priority – don't let marking overwhelm your research | ||
* | * Discuss workload concerns with your supervisor and GTA Lead | ||
* It's okay to | * It's okay to say no to additional marking if it's affecting your studies | ||
=== Develop Your Skills === | === Develop Your Skills === | ||
* Marking is a | * Marking is a valuable professional skill | ||
* Reflect on your marking practice | * Reflect on your marking practice | ||
* Consider using your marking experience towards | * Consider using your marking experience towards LEAP accreditation | ||
* Each marking experience helps you develop as an | * Each marking experience helps you develop as an educator | ||
'''[[GTA:Main_Page|← Back to the Main GTA Page]]''' | '''[[GTA:Main_Page|← Back to the Main GTA Page]]''' | ||
Revision as of 16:06, 9 October 2025
TL;DR
- Mark students' work, where necessary, on time and provide fair and unbiased feedback to the students.
- Make sure you understand the rubric; discuss it with the unit lead and fellow GTAs to double-check that you all have the same understanding.
- Be fair to each of the students and not act in a biased manner to any of the students.
- Do not show students the marking scheme or other students' marks.
- You should raise any concerns about cheating/plagiarism etc with unit leads but please do not try to deal with it yourself, the University has set procedures for this.
- If you are assigned to mark a student who as not submitted, just leave the mark blank (ie don't enter zero) as the student may have special circumstances resulting in a late submission.
Essential Resources
- FSE GTA Hub: https://www.staffnet.manchester.ac.uk/fse/teaching-college/teaching-academy/gtahub/
- GTA General Information: https://www.staffnet.manchester.ac.uk/people/current-staff/gtas/
- University Policy on Marking: Contact Course Unit Lead for latest version
- Dignity at Work Policy: https://www.staffnet.manchester.ac.uk/equality-and-diversity/policies-and-guidance/dignity-at-work-and-study/
Before You Start Marking
Complete Mandatory Training
- ✓ You MUST complete FSESS8202 Marking and Feedback training before undertaking any marking activity
- ✓ Ensure you have completed all other mandatory GTA training modules
- ✓ Attend any unit-specific marking briefings or calibration sessions
Understand the Assessment
- Read the assignment brief thoroughly – understand what students were asked to do
- Study the marking scheme/rubric in detail – know exactly what each grade band represents
- Review exemplar work if provided by the Course Unit Lead
- Clarify any uncertainties with the Course Unit Lead before you begin marking
- Discuss the rubric with fellow GTAs to ensure consistent understanding
- Check submission deadlines and be aware of any students with approved extensions
Prepare Your Workspace
Ensure you have access to:
- Canvas (for accessing submissions and entering marks)
- The marking scheme/rubric
- Model answers or solutions (where applicable)
- Contact details for the Course Unit Lead
Additional preparation:
- Set aside uninterrupted time for marking to maintain consistency
- Have a clear system for tracking which submissions you've marked
Understanding Marking Schemes & Rubrics
What Is a Marking Scheme?
A marking scheme (also called a rubric) is a structured guide that:
- Defines the assessment criteria for the work
- Shows how marks are allocated across different elements
- Describes what constitutes different quality levels of work (e.g., what distinguishes a First from a 2:1)
How to Use the Marking Scheme Effectively
1. Study It Thoroughly
- Read through the entire scheme before marking any work
- Note the weighting of different sections or criteria
- Understand the descriptors for each grade band
- Identify any areas where professional judgement is required
2. Apply It Consistently
- Use the same standards for all students
- Mark to the rubric, not to your personal preferences
- Be objective – your personal opinion of the topic is irrelevant
- Don't compare students to each other; compare their work to the criteria
3. Calibrate With Others
- Discuss interpretation of the rubric with other GTAs
- If possible, independently mark a sample submission, then compare marks
- Resolve any discrepancies in understanding with the Course Unit Lead
- This ensures consistency across all markers
4. Document Your Decisions
- Make brief notes about why you awarded specific marks
- This helps if you need to justify marks later
- It also helps you maintain consistency across all submissions
During Marking
Marking Process Best Practices
Start With a Sample
- Mark 2-3 submissions first to calibrate your marking
- Check these with the Course Unit Lead if possible
- This helps you understand the range of quality you'll encounter
- Adjust your approach if needed before continuing
Work Systematically
- Mark in batches to maintain consistency
- Take regular breaks to avoid marker fatigue
- Don't rush – quality and fairness are paramount
- If you're unsure about a mark, flag it and ask the Course Unit Lead
Apply Criteria Fairly
- Every student receives the same careful attention
- Don't show favouritism or mark down students you recognise
- Ignore names if possible (some systems allow anonymous marking)
- Be particularly careful to avoid unconscious bias
Handle Edge Cases
- If a submission is unclear or incomplete, don't assume – mark what's there
- For suspected plagiarism or cheating, assign a mark but report to Course Unit Lead immediately
- For late submissions without extensions, mark these, late submissions are taken care of separately
- For missing submissions, leave the mark blank (don't enter zero) – student may have special circumstances
Providing High-Quality Feedback
Why Feedback Matters
Good feedback:
- Helps students understand their performance
- Identifies strengths in their work
- Highlights areas for improvement
- Guides students on how to improve in future assessments
- Is a legal requirement under University policy
Principles of Effective Feedback
1. Be Constructive
- ✓ DO: "Your analysis of the data was thorough, but consider discussing the limitations of your methodology to strengthen future work."
- ✗ DON'T: "This analysis is weak."
2. Be Specific
- ✓ DO: "Your introduction clearly states the research question, but could benefit from more context about why this question matters in the field."
- ✗ DON'T: "Introduction needs work."
3. Balance Positive and Developmental Comments
- Highlight strengths as well as areas for improvement
- Start with positive observations where genuine
- Frame criticism as opportunities for development
- Example: "You've demonstrated strong understanding of X. To develop further, consider exploring Y in more depth."
4. Be Clear and Actionable
- ✓ DO: "Include more recent sources (published within the last 5 years) to strengthen your literature review."
- ✗ DON'T: "Literature review could be better."
5. Link Feedback to Criteria
- Explicitly reference the marking criteria in your feedback
- Help students understand why they achieved particular marks
- Example: "This section scored 15/20 because whilst the theoretical framework is sound (meeting criterion 2), the application to the case study could be more detailed (criterion 3)."
Feedback Format
Written Comments
- Provide feedback directly on Blackboard or as instructed by Course Unit Lead
- Use professional language – remember this is an official University document
- Check your spelling and grammar – poor writing undermines your credibility
- Be respectful and encouraging in tone
- Aim for 150-300 words of general feedback (unless told otherwise)
Rubric Marking
Many units use structured rubrics with predefined criteria and grade descriptors.
Rubric-based feedback provides clear, criterion-referenced comments for each assessment area:
- Select the appropriate descriptor for each criterion based on the student's performance
- Add brief personalised comments within each criterion to explain your selection
Benefits of rubric marking:
- Ensures consistency across all students
- Makes your marking process transparent to students
- Helps students understand exactly where they met/missed criteria
- Reduces marking time whilst maintaining quality feedback
How to use rubrics effectively:
- Review all criteria before starting to mark
- Mark each criterion independently – don't let performance in one area bias another
- Use the full range of descriptors available (don't cluster all marks in the middle)
- Add personalised comments even when using standard descriptors (e.g., "You've demonstrated strong critical analysis here, particularly in your evaluation of Source X")
- Ensure your overall comments align with the rubric scores selected
Common pitfall:
- Don't just tick boxes without explanation – students benefit from understanding why they achieved each level
Marginal Comments
- Add brief annotations within the work where appropriate
- Highlight specific examples of good practice or errors
- Use these to support your general comments
- Don't overload the work with comments – focus on the most important points
Feed-Forward
- Where possible, include advice for future assessments
- Suggest specific strategies for improvement
- Direct students to relevant resources if appropriate
- Example: "For your next submission, review the University Academic Phrasebank to strengthen your academic writing style."
Quality Assurance & Moderation
GTAs Do NOT Have Sole Responsibility
- All marking by GTAs must be second-marked or moderated by the Course Unit Lead
- This is a University policy requirement
- You are contributing to the assessment process, not making final decisions
The Moderation Process
- You mark the work according to the rubric
- Enter provisional marks on Canvas
- Course Unit Lead reviews a sample or all of your marking
- Marks may be adjusted to ensure consistency and standards
- Final marks are confirmed by the Course Unit Lead
If Your Marks Are Adjusted
- This is normal and part of quality assurance
- It's an opportunity to learn and develop your marking skills
- Ask for feedback on your marking from the Course Unit Lead
- Use this to improve consistency in future marking
- Don't take it personally – the goal is fairness for students
Common Marking Challenges & Solutions
Challenge: Inconsistent Quality Within One Submission
Solution: Mark each section against its specific criteria. A submission can score well in some areas and poorly in others. Your overall mark should reflect the marking scheme's weighting.
Challenge: Work That Doesn't Fit Neatly Into Grade Bands
Solution: Use your professional judgement to place the work in the most appropriate band, then use the mark range within that band to fine-tune. Discuss borderline cases with the Course Unit Lead.
Challenge: Difficulty Reading or Understanding the Submission
Solution: Mark what is clearly communicated. Poor presentation or unclear writing is part of the assessment. If genuinely illegible, consult the Course Unit Lead.
Challenge: Marker Fatigue
Solution:
- Take regular breaks (e.g., after every 5 submissions)
- Don't try to mark too many in one session
- Revisit your first few marks after a break to check consistency
- If you feel your concentration slipping, stop and resume later
Challenge: Emotional Responses to Student Work
Solution:
- Remain objective – you're marking the work, not the student
- If you feel too emotionally affected (e.g., by distressing content), stop marking and consult the Course Unit Lead
- Your wellbeing matters too
Challenge: Time Management
Solution:
- Estimate time per submission based on your allocation
- If you're taking significantly longer than expected, discuss with Course Unit Lead – you may need guidance or the rubric may need clarifying
- Claim all hours worked – don't work unpaid
What GTAs Should NOT Do
Set Summative Assessments
GTAs must never be asked to write or set assessments that contribute to final marks.
Have Sole Marking Responsibility
All GTA marking must be overseen, second-marked, or moderated by the Course Unit Lead.
Be the Point of Contact for Marks Disputes
Students questioning marks should contact the Course Unit Lead, not GTAs. Direct any such queries immediately to the Course Unit Lead.
Show Students the Marking Scheme (If Confidential)
If the detailed marking scheme is not released to students, do not share it. You can discuss general assessment criteria.
Show Students Other Students' Marks
Never disclose another student's performance or marks. This breaches confidentiality and GDPR.
Discuss Suspected Academic Misconduct With Students
If you suspect plagiarism, cheating, or collusion, report it to the Course Unit Lead immediately. Do not confront the student or discuss it with them.
Mark Work From Students on Your Own Programme
You cannot mark work from modules that contribute to a programme on which you are enrolled.
Provide Pastoral Care
GTAs are not responsible for pastoral support. If a student raises personal issues:
- Be empathetic but don't try to counsel them
- Direct them to appropriate support services
- Inform the Course Unit Lead if appropriate
Entering Marks & Record Keeping
Using Canvas
- Enter marks promptly as instructed by the Course Unit Lead
- Double-check you've entered the mark in the correct field
- Save your feedback before moving to the next submission
- Keep a backup record of marks (e.g., in a spreadsheet) until moderation is complete
Recording Your Time
Track all marking time including:
- Reading submissions
- Applying the rubric
- Writing feedback
- Entering marks on Blackboard
- Any required meetings or calibration sessions
Important:
- Declare hours monthly in the GTA portal, even if zero
- If marking takes significantly longer than allocated, discuss with Course Unit Lead
Deadlines
- Respect marking deadlines – delays affect students and teaching staff
- If you cannot meet a deadline, notify the Course Unit Lead immediately (as far in advance as possible)
- Build in buffer time for unexpected issues
Academic Integrity & Misconduct
Recognising Potential Misconduct
Plagiarism Warning Signs
- Sudden changes in writing style or quality within a submission
- Text that seems too advanced for the level
- Inconsistent referencing or missing citations
- Content that doesn't address the specific assignment brief
Collusion Warning Signs
- Identical or near-identical submissions from multiple students
- Same unusual errors or phrasing across multiple submissions
What To Do If You Suspect Misconduct
- Keep marking the submission
- Document what you've observed
- Contact the Course Unit Lead immediately
- Do assign a mark
- Do not discuss with the student
- Let the University's formal procedures handle it
Your Responsibilities
- Maintain confidentiality about any suspected cases
- Follow University procedures exactly
- Remember: your role is to report suspicions, not to investigate or adjudicate
Maintaining Professionalism
Professional Standards
- ✓ Mark impartially and without bias
- ✓ Respect confidentiality – never discuss individual students' work inappropriately
- ✓ Meet deadlines and commitments
- ✓ Communicate professionally in all written feedback
- ✓ Maintain appropriate boundaries with students
- ✓ Seek support when needed
Avoiding Bias
Be aware of unconscious bias related to:
- Names suggesting gender, ethnicity, or nationality
- Writing style or accent in written English
- Topics that align or conflict with your personal views
Key points:
- If you find yourself with strong emotional reactions to a student's work, pause and consider whether bias might affect your marking
- Remember: you're marking the work against criteria, not expressing personal agreement or disagreement
Self-Care
- Marking can be mentally demanding – take care of yourself
- If you encounter distressing content (e.g., in creative writing or case studies), take breaks and seek support
- Don't let marking consume excessive time – if it's taking too long, get help
- Remember your primary role is as a researcher – don't let marking harm your PhD progress
Getting Help & Support
When to Ask for Help
- You're unsure how to interpret the marking scheme
- You encounter a borderline or unusual submission
- You suspect academic misconduct
- Marking is taking significantly longer than allocated time
- You're struggling with the workload
- You have concerns about bias or fairness
- A student has contacted you about their mark
Who to Contact
First: Course Unit Lead
Your primary contact for all marking-related questions:
- Clarification on marking schemes
- Guidance on difficult submissions
- Reporting suspected misconduct
- Time management issues
Second: Your GTA Lead/Line Manager
For broader concerns:
- Workload overwhelming your PhD commitments
- Training needs
- General GTA role questions
Third: Faculty GTA Administration
For administrative issues:
- Payment queries
- Contractual questions
- Training records
Key Policies to Remember
University Policy on Marking
- GTAs must have appropriate training before marking
- All GTA marking must be overseen by Course Unit Lead
- Marks must be awarded according to published criteria
- Feedback must be provided to students
- Moderation/second-marking is required
Data Protection & GDPR
- Student marks and work are confidential
- Never share student data inappropriately
- Secure any student work you handle
- Follow University protocols for data handling
- Refer to Information Security & Data Protection training
Special Circumstances
- Students may have approved extensions
- Some students have learning support plans (you may not be told details)
- Late submissions without extensions should not normally be marked without Course Unit Lead instruction
- Missing submissions: enter no mark (leave blank) rather than zero
Quick Checklist: Before Submitting Marks
Before you submit your marking, check:
- ☐ I have completed the mandatory FSESS8202 Marking and Feedback training
- ☐ I understand the marking scheme/rubric thoroughly
- ☐ I have marked all assigned submissions
- ☐ I have provided constructive feedback for each submission
- ☐ I have entered all marks correctly on Blackboard
- ☐ I have kept a backup record of marks
- ☐ I have flagged any concerns or unusual cases to the Course Unit Lead
- ☐ I have recorded my time accurately for payment
- ☐ I have reported any suspected academic misconduct
- ☐ I have maintained confidentiality throughout
Final Reminders
Marking Is a Professional Activity
- Your marking directly affects students' outcomes
- Take it seriously and maintain high standards
- Your fairness and consistency matter enormously
You're Part of a Team
- You're not alone – the Course Unit Lead oversees all marking
- Ask questions – it's better to check than to mark incorrectly
- Learn from feedback on your marking
Balance Your Commitments
- Your PhD is your priority – don't let marking overwhelm your research
- Discuss workload concerns with your supervisor and GTA Lead
- It's okay to say no to additional marking if it's affecting your studies
Develop Your Skills
- Marking is a valuable professional skill
- Reflect on your marking practice
- Consider using your marking experience towards LEAP accreditation
- Each marking experience helps you develop as an educator