GTA:What You Should Expect from CS Unit Academic Staff
TL;DR
- Introduce themselves to the GTAs before teaching starts.
- Prepare weekly guidance for the GTAs; this could include answers to common questions, solutions to exercises, or tips for making the session run smoothly, but it will depend on the individual module.
- Be approachable, professional, and unbiased, and offer help when requested.
- Step in to help the GTAs if a problematic or personal welfare situation arises.
- Turn up to scheduled sessions and stay for the entire session.
- Prepare coursework on Canvas and release it to the GTAs in time for the GTAs to study it before the session.
- Understand if a GTA needs to drop their module due to work or personal reasons.
- Be knowledgeable and communicate to the GTAs their role during the sessions.
Before Teaching Starts
Introduction and Welcome
What to Expect
- Course Unit Lead should introduce themselves to you before teaching begins
- Initial meeting or communication (face-to-face, email, or video call) to welcome you to the teaching team
- Introduction to other GTAs working on the same unit
- Overview of the unit – aims, structure, assessment, your role
Why This Matters
- Establishes a professional relationship from the outset
- Helps you feel welcomed and valued as part of the team
- Provides context for your work – you understand where you fit in
- Creates an open channel for communication
- Demonstrates that the Course Unit Lead is organised and prepared
What This Should Include
- Course Unit Lead's name and contact details
- Best methods for contacting them (email, office hours, etc.)
- Overview of the unit structure and schedule
- Your specific role and responsibilities
- Names of other GTAs and teaching staff
- Key dates and deadlines
If This Doesn't Happen
- Reach out proactively – email the Course Unit Lead to introduce yourself
- Ask for a brief meeting to discuss your role
- If you receive no response, contact your GTA Lead (Simon Harper)
- Don't wait until the first session to sort this out
Clear Role Definition
What to Expect
- Clear communication about what you'll be doing in sessions
- Specific responsibilities defined (e.g., demonstrating, answering questions, supervising practicals)
- Boundaries of your role – what you're not expected to do
- Time allocation – how your contracted hours should be distributed
- Expected preparation – what you need to do before sessions
Examples of Good Role Definition
- "You'll be demonstrating in the lab sessions on Wednesdays 2-4pm. Students will be working through practical exercises, and your role is to circulate, answer questions, and help debug code. You're not expected to mark work or handle pastoral issues."
- "Your role includes leading the tutorial, marking the weekly problem sheets, and being available for 1 hour per week for student queries. Preparation time is estimated at 2 hours per week."
Examples of Poor Role Definition
- "Just help out in the labs." (Too vague)
- "Cover whatever needs doing." (No clear boundaries)
- "We'll figure it out as we go." (Lacks planning)
Why Clear Definition Matters
- You can prepare appropriately
- You know what's within your remit and what to refer to staff
- You can plan your time effectively
- Prevents scope creep – being asked to do more than contracted
- Reduces anxiety about what's expected
Access to Materials and Resources
What to Expect
- Access to course materials well before sessions (ideally 1 week minimum)
- Materials should be complete and ready – not rushed or unfinished
- All necessary resources provided:
- Lecture slides and notes
- Practical exercises and solutions
- Marking schemes (if you're marking)
- Model answers or examples
- Any software or datasets needed
Timing of Access
- Before semester starts – overview materials and schedule
- At least 1 week before sessions – detailed materials for upcoming teaching
- Earlier for marking – schemes should be available when you start marking
What This Enables
- Adequate preparation time – you can study materials thoroughly
- Questions to be asked – you have time to clarify uncertainties
- Confidence in sessions – you know what you're teaching
- Quality teaching – well-prepared GTAs teach better
- Managing your time – you can plan PhD work around preparation
If Materials Are Late or Incomplete
- Request materials explicitly – "I need the materials for next week's session by [date] to prepare adequately."
- Explain the impact – "Without the solutions, I won't be able to help students effectively."
- Flag concerns early – don't wait until the day before
- Document the issue – keep records of when you requested materials
- Escalate if necessary – if this is a pattern, raise with your GTA Lead
Weekly Guidance and Support
What to Expect
Course Unit Leads should prepare weekly guidance for GTAs, which could include:
- Answers to common questions students typically ask
- Solutions to exercises students will be working on
- Tips for making the session run smoothly
- Heads-up about tricky concepts or common misconceptions
- Updates or changes to the session plan
- Marking guidance (if applicable that week)
Format
This guidance might be:
- A brief document or email
- Notes added to the course materials
- Discussed in a weekly GTA meeting
- Posted on Blackboard or shared drive
The format matters less than the content – you need the information to teach effectively.
Why This Matters
- Anticipates challenges – you're prepared for difficult questions
- Consistency across GTAs – everyone teaches to the same standard
- Saves your time – you don't have to figure out everything independently
- Quality assurance – students get consistent, accurate help
- Shows the Course Unit Lead is engaged and supporting you
Individual Module Variations
The guidance will depend on the individual module:
- Programming modules might focus on common errors and debugging strategies
- Theory modules might highlight conceptual difficulties
- Project-based modules might provide assessment criteria clarification
The Course Unit Lead knows their module and should tailor guidance appropriately.
If Weekly Guidance Isn't Provided
- Ask for it – "Would it be possible to provide brief guidance each week on common issues?"
- Suggest what would help – "Notes on typical student questions would be really useful."
- Create your own notes – document what you discover and share with other GTAs
- Discuss with other GTAs – peer support can partially fill this gap
- Raise concerns if lack of guidance affects teaching quality
During the Teaching Period
Accessibility and Approachability
What to Expect
Course Unit Leads should be:
- Approachable – you feel comfortable asking questions or raising concerns
- Professional – treating you with respect and courtesy
- Unbiased – no favouritism or unfair treatment
- Available – responding to communications in reasonable timeframes
- Helpful – offering support when requested
Approachability in Practice
- Responds to emails within 48 hours (working days)
- Welcomes questions – doesn't make you feel stupid for asking
- Takes concerns seriously – listens and addresses issues
- Open communication style – doesn't communicate only through directives
- Visible and accessible – attends sessions, has office hours, or provides alternatives
Professional Standards
- Respectful language and tone in all communications
- Acknowledges your contributions and thanks you for your work
- Provides constructive feedback rather than criticism
- Maintains appropriate boundaries (not overly familiar, not cold and distant)
- Models good practice – demonstrates the standards they expect
If Course Unit Lead Is Not Approachable
- Document specific incidents – what happened, when, and how it affected you
- Try to address directly – "I'd find it easier to ask questions if..."
- Seek support from GTA Lead – describe the issues you're experiencing
- Don't suffer in silence – inaccessible staff affect your ability to do your job
- Remember your rights – you deserve professional treatment
Attendance at Sessions
What to Expect
- Course Unit Lead should turn up to scheduled sessions
- Should stay for the entire session (or arrange appropriate cover)
- Should be actively engaged – not just present but participating
Why This Is Important
- You're not solely responsible – GTAs work under supervision
- Complex questions can be referred to the Course Unit Lead
- Student welfare issues can be handled appropriately
- Quality assurance – the lead sees how the teaching is going
- Support for you – you have backup if problems arise
- Models professionalism – showing the session matters
Course Unit Lead's Role in Sessions
- Available for complex questions beyond GTA expertise
- Monitors how the session is going – pacing, student engagement, issues
- Supports GTAs – steps in if you need help
- Handles disruptions or difficult situations
- Provides immediate feedback – what's working, what could improve
If Course Unit Lead Is Absent
- Occasional absences are understandable (illness, conferences, emergencies)
- Should provide advance notice when possible
- Should arrange appropriate cover – another member of staff or clear instructions
- Frequent absence is problematic – this should be raised
What to Do If This Is an Issue
- Keep a log – when they were absent, whether notice was given
- Note the impact – "I couldn't answer student questions about X" or "A student had a welfare concern I wasn't equipped to handle"
- Raise with your GTA Lead – this affects your ability to work safely and effectively
- Don't try to cover for persistent absence – this is beyond your responsibility
Support During Sessions
What to Expect
When the Course Unit Lead is present in sessions, they should:
- Be available for consultation – you can approach them with questions
- Circulate – not just sit at the front
- Step in to help if you're struggling with a question or situation
- Handle problems that are beyond your role (welfare, misconduct, complex academic issues)
- Back you up – support your authority as a GTA
Problematic Situations They Should Handle
- Student welfare concerns – a student is distressed or discloses personal issues
- Behavioural problems – disruptive, disrespectful, or inappropriate student behaviour
- Academic misconduct – suspected plagiarism or cheating
- Questions far beyond scope – theoretical questions beyond the unit content
- Technical problems – system failures, software issues affecting whole class
- Complaints – if a student complains about teaching or marking
Why You Shouldn't Handle These Alone
- Not your job – these require staff authority or expertise
- Risk to you – handling welfare or behavioural issues without training is risky
- Risk to students – they need appropriate professional support
- Liability – the University is responsible, not you personally
- Your primary role – is teaching support, not pastoral care or disciplinary action
How to Get Support in the Moment
- Approach the Course Unit Lead directly – "Could you help with this situation?"
- Be specific – "This student seems very distressed" or "This question is beyond what I can answer"
- Don't feel embarrassed – asking for help is professional, not weakness
- If Course Unit Lead is not present – handle immediate safety (use SafeZone if needed), then report afterwards
Communication and Responsiveness
What to Expect
- Timely responses to your communications (emails, messages)
- Clear communication – not ambiguous or assuming you understand
- Regular updates – any changes to sessions, materials, expectations
- Two-way communication – they listen to you as well as directing you
- Appropriate channels – using University email and systems
Reasonable Response Times
- Routine queries: Within 48 hours (working days)
- Urgent issues: Same day or next working day
- Out of hours: Not expected to respond (unless genuine emergency)
- Semester breaks: Response times may be longer, but this should be communicated
Types of Communication
Course Unit Lead should communicate:
- Before sessions: Materials, guidance, any changes
- During sessions: Available for immediate queries
- After sessions: Feedback, follow-up on issues raised
- Ongoing: Updates, reminders, information
- Responsive: Replies to your emails and questions
Quality of Communication
- Clear and specific – you understand what's expected
- Professional tone – respectful and appropriate
- Complete information – you have everything you need
- Timely – in time for you to act on it
- Accessible – language and format are understandable
If Communication Is Poor
- Be explicit about what you need – "I need the session materials by Friday to prepare over the weekend."
- Follow up on non-responses – after 48 hours, send a gentle reminder
- Document communication issues – save emails, note when you sent/received messages
- Raise with GTA Lead if it's affecting your work
- Don't make assumptions – if something is unclear, ask for clarification
Flexibility and Understanding
What to Expect
- Understanding if you need to drop the module due to work or personal reasons
- Supportive response to reasonable requests (e.g., changing a session due to PhD commitment)
- Recognition that you're a PhD student first – your research is priority
- Reasonable expectations – not expecting you to work beyond contracted hours
- Flexibility when possible – though this must be balanced with teaching needs
Examples of Reasonable Requests
- "I have my PhD viva in week 8 – could another GTA cover my session that week?"
- "I'm struggling with the workload this semester – could I reduce my hours next semester?"
- "This is taking longer than the allocated time – could we discuss the expectations?"
- "I'm unwell and can't make today's session – I've tried to arrange cover."
Course Unit Lead Should
- Listen without judgement – hear your circumstances
- Try to accommodate where possible – within constraints of teaching delivery
- Be supportive – recognise you're managing multiple commitments
- Help find solutions – not just say no
- Respect confidentiality – you don't have to disclose personal details
What They Can't Always Do
- Cancel sessions – teaching commitments must be met
- Reduce session frequency – this is set by the module design
- Guarantee flexibility – some things are non-negotiable
- Solve PhD problems – they can be understanding but can't fix your research issues
The Key Principle
Course Unit Leads should be reasonable and treat you as a professional. They should recognise that:
- Circumstances change
- Life happens
- You're doing your best to balance multiple roles
- Communication and mutual respect matter
If You're Not Treated with Understanding
- Clearly explain your situation – provide context for your request
- Suggest solutions – show you're trying to be responsible
- Involve your PhD supervisor – they can support your case if needed
- Contact your GTA Lead – if the Course Unit Lead is unreasonable
- Know your rights – you have employment protections
Teaching Materials and Preparation =
Complete and Quality Materials
What to Expect
- Coursework prepared on Blackboard/Canvas and complete
- Released to GTAs in time to study before the session
- High quality – clear, accurate, appropriate for level
- All necessary components – not missing pieces
- Updated annually – not outdated or containing errors
"In Time" Means
- Minimum 1 week before you need to use them
- Earlier for complex material – programming assignments, long exercises
- Earlier for marking – you need schemes before students submit
- Ideally at start of semester – so you can see the whole unit
What "Complete" Means
- All files present – no broken links or missing documents
- Solutions provided (where relevant) – answers to exercises, code that works
- Marking schemes (if you're marking) – clear criteria and grade boundaries
- Supporting materials – any datasets, software, documentation needed
Quality Indicators
- Accurate information – no errors or outdated content
- Appropriate difficulty – matches the level of students
- Clear instructions – students and GTAs understand what to do
- Well-formatted – readable, accessible, professional
- Tested – exercises work, code runs, links function
If Materials Are Inadequate
- Flag specific issues – "The solution to question 3 doesn't compile" or "The marking scheme is missing section B"
- Request corrections promptly – so they can be fixed before the session
- Document what's missing – list specifically what you need
- Offer to help if appropriate – "I could test the code if that would help"
- Don't struggle on with bad materials – this affects teaching quality and your time
Software and Technical Resources
What to Expect
- All necessary software available before sessions
- Instructions for setup – how to access and use tools
- Testing done – Course Unit Lead has checked everything works
- Backup plans – what to do if systems fail
- Technical support available – who to contact for IT issues
Your Preparation
- Download necessary software before GTA sessions (as advised in CS GTA cheat sheet)
- Test it works – don't wait until the session
- Familiarise yourself with tools and interfaces
- Report problems early – "I can't access the dataset" or "The software won't install"
Course Unit Lead Should
- Provide clear instructions – how to get and use software
- Test the full student journey – does the exercise actually work?
- Anticipate common problems – and provide solutions
- Be available for technical queries – especially first time you use something new
Technical Support
- School IT support for installation and access issues
- Course Unit Lead for subject-specific tool queries
- Documentation and tutorials provided for complex tools
Model Answers and Worked Solutions
What to Expect
- Complete worked solutions to exercises students will attempt
- Model code that works – tested and debugged
- Explanations of approaches – not just answers, but reasoning
- Common variations – different valid ways to solve problems
- Typical errors and how to fix them
Why This Matters
- You can answer student questions confidently
- You understand the expected approach – can guide students appropriately
- You can debug effectively – compare student work to working model
- Consistency – all GTAs teach the same correct approach
- Saves your time – you don't have to work everything out yourself
For Programming Modules
- Code should compile and run
- Should be well-commented – explaining logic
- Should demonstrate good practice – code students should emulate
- Should match the exercise requirements – not over-engineered or too simple
If Solutions Aren't Provided
- Request them explicitly – "Could I have the model solutions to prepare effectively?"
- Explain why you need them – "Students will ask why their code doesn't work, and I need to compare to a correct version"
- Allow time for Course Unit Lead to provide them – give reasonable notice
- Collaborate with other GTAs – work together to understand the material
- Escalate if necessary – if Course Unit Lead consistently doesn't provide solutions
Assessment and Marking
Marking Schemes and Criteria
What to Expect (If You're Marking)
- Clear, detailed marking scheme provided before you start marking
- Rubrics or criteria explaining what merits each grade
- Model answers showing what constitutes different quality levels
- Calibration opportunity – discussion or sample marking to ensure consistency
- Guidance on common issues – what students typically struggle with
Timing
- Before students submit – ideally when assignment is released
- Minimum: before you start marking – you need it to mark fairly
- Time to review and ask questions – you must understand the scheme
Quality of Marking Schemes
- Specific – "Award 2 marks for defining the term correctly" not "Award marks for understanding"
- Comprehensive – covers all parts of the assignment
- Aligned with assessment – marks allocated match the questions
- Fair – objective criteria that can be applied consistently
- Explained – you understand the reasoning behind the grades
Support in Marking
- Opportunity to discuss the scheme – ask questions and clarify
- Calibration exercise – mark sample work and compare with Course Unit Lead
- Ongoing support – can ask about borderline cases
- Moderation – Course Unit Lead checks a sample of your marking
- Feedback on your marking – how to improve for next time
If Marking Scheme Is Inadequate
- Ask for clarification – "How should I mark question 3?"
- Request examples – "Could you show me what a 2:1 answer looks like?"
- Raise specific issues – "The scheme doesn't cover students who used approach X"
- Don't guess – if unsure, ask rather than make up criteria
- Document ambiguities – note where scheme was unclear
Moderation and Quality Assurance
What to Expect
- Your marking will be checked – this is policy and normal practice
- Feedback on your marking – what you did well, what to adjust
- Marks may be adjusted – to ensure consistency and standards
- Supportive approach – helping you develop marking skills, not criticism
- Process explained – you understand how moderation works
Why Moderation Happens
- University policy – GTAs cannot have sole responsibility for marking
- Quality assurance – ensures standards are maintained
- Fairness to students – consistent marking across all scripts
- Your development – learning to mark well is a skill
- Not personal – it's about the process, not questioning your ability
How to Respond to Moderation
- Accept feedback positively – it's developmental, not critical
- Ask questions – "Why was this mark adjusted?"
- Learn from it – apply feedback to future marking
- Don't take adjustments personally – even experienced markers have variation
- Use it to improve – marking is a skill you're developing
Problem Resolution and Support
When Issues Arise
Course Unit Lead Should
- Listen to your concerns without dismissing them
- Take problems seriously – not minimise or ignore
- Work with you to find solutions – collaborative approach
- Act on issues – make changes where needed
- Follow up – check the problem is resolved
Types of Problems Course Unit Lead Should Address
- Inadequate materials or preparation
- Student behaviour issues
- Unclear expectations or changing requirements
- Workload exceeding contracted hours
- Technical problems affecting teaching
- Safety concerns
- Issues with other GTAs
Problem-Solving Process
- You raise the issue – clearly and specifically
- Course Unit Lead listens – takes it seriously
- Discussion – understanding the problem fully
- Solutions proposed – Course Unit Lead or together
- Action taken – changes implemented
- Follow-up – check it's resolved
If Course Unit Lead Doesn't Address Issues
- Be more explicit – perhaps they didn't understand the seriousness
- Put it in writing – email creates a record
- Escalate to your GTA Lead – Simon Harper for CS GTAs
- Document everything – keep records of issues and your attempts to resolve them
- Know your rights – some issues are serious enough for formal processes
Feedback on Your Teaching
What to Expect
- Regular, informal feedback – "That explanation worked well" or "Students seemed confused about X"
- Constructive approach – focusing on development, not criticism
- Specific examples – not vague comments
- Balanced – acknowledging strengths as well as areas to develop
- Actionable – suggestions for improvement, not just critique
When Feedback Should Be Given
- Immediately after sessions – brief comments on what went well/could improve
- Mid-semester – more formal review of your teaching
- End of semester – overall assessment and development for future
- Ongoing – responsive to your requests for feedback
How Feedback Should Be Delivered
- Private – not in front of students or other GTAs
- Respectful tone – supportive, not harsh
- Two-way conversation – you can respond and discuss
- Focuses on behaviour, not personality – "Try explaining that concept differently" not "You're not a clear explainer"
- Offers support – "Would you like to observe how I tackle that topic?"
Asking for Feedback
- You can request feedback – "How do you think that session went?"
- Be specific – "I struggled with explaining X – do you have suggestions?"
- Shows professionalism – wanting to improve demonstrates good practice
- Course Unit Lead should welcome this – and provide thoughtful feedback
If You Receive Unfair or Unhelpful Feedback
- Ask for clarification – "Could you explain what you mean?"
- Request specific examples – "When did you observe that?"
- Discuss your perspective – there may be context they don't know
- If feedback is unprofessional – harsh, personal, or humiliating – this is unacceptable
- Report unprofessional feedback to your GTA Lead
Professional Standards and Respect
Mutual Respect
What Respect Looks Like
- Polite communication – courteous tone in person and writing
- Timely responses – valuing your time by replying promptly
- Listening – genuinely hearing your questions and concerns
- Acknowledging your contributions – thanking you for your work
- Treating you as a colleague – not as a subordinate or servant
- Recognising your expertise – valuing what you bring
- Professional boundaries – appropriate relationship, not overly familiar or cold
What Disrespect Looks Like
- Dismissive communication – "Just deal with it" or ignoring concerns
- Unavailability – consistently not responding or inaccessible
- Undermining you – contradicting you in front of students
- Blame – making you responsible for their failings
- Inappropriate behaviour – anything making you uncomfortable
- Discrimination – treating you differently based on protected characteristics
- Exploitation – expecting work beyond contracted hours without payment
Your Right to Respectful Treatment
- You deserve the same respect as any employee
- Dignity at Work policy applies to you: https://www.staffnet.manchester.ac.uk/equality-and-diversity/policies-and-guidance/dignity-at-work-and-study/
- Disrespectful treatment is not acceptable – you can report it
- Being a GTA doesn't mean accepting poor treatment – you have rights
Professional Conduct
Course Unit Lead Should Model
- Punctuality – arriving on time for sessions
- Preparation – materials ready, organised
- Professionalism – appropriate behaviour and communication
- Ethical conduct – honesty, integrity, fairness
- Commitment – fulfilling their responsibilities
- Respect for students – appropriate boundaries and support
Why This Matters
- Sets the standard for the teaching team
- You learn professional behaviour by observation
- Creates positive environment – professionalism makes work better
- Students see good modelling – affects their behaviour too
- Makes your job easier – working with professional staff is smoother
When Expectations Aren't Met
Addressing Issues Directly
First Step: Communication
Before escalating, try to address issues directly with the Course Unit Lead (unless the issue is serious misconduct or makes you unsafe).
How to raise concerns:
- Choose the right time – not in the middle of a session, but soon after
- Be specific – "I didn't receive the materials for next week's session" not "You're not supporting me"
- Focus on impact – "Without the solutions, I can't help students debug their code"
- Suggest solutions – "Could materials be posted on Fridays for the following week?"
- Stay professional – calm, factual tone even if you're frustrated
Why direct communication first:
- May be unintentional – they might not realise there's a problem
- Quick resolution – can often be fixed immediately
- Maintains relationship – shows you're professional and collaborative
- Escalation may not be needed – saves everyone time and stress
When Direct Communication Isn't Appropriate
Don't attempt to address directly if:
- The issue involves bullying or harassment
- You feel unsafe or intimidated
- It's a serious breach of policy or ethics
- You've tried before and nothing changed
- The Course Unit Lead is actively hostile to feedback
Summary: What Good Looks Like
A Good Course Unit Lead
Communication
- Introduces themselves before teaching starts
- Responds to emails within 48 hours
- Provides clear, complete information
- Welcomes questions and discussion
- Keeps you informed of changes
Materials and Preparation
- Provides materials at least 1 week ahead
- Materials are complete, tested, and high quality
- Gives weekly guidance relevant to upcoming sessions
- Ensures you have everything needed to teach effectively
Support and Availability
- Attends all scheduled sessions (or arranges cover)
- Is approachable and helpful
- Steps in when problems arise
- Provides constructive feedback
- Supports your development as a teacher
Professionalism
- Models good professional behaviour
- Treats you with respect
- Is organised and prepared
- Fulfils their responsibilities
- Maintains appropriate boundaries
Flexibility and Understanding
- Recognises you're a PhD student first
- Is understanding about work-life balance
- Is reasonable with requests when possible
- Doesn't expect unpaid work beyond your contract
- Supports you when circumstances change
Your Experience Should Be
- Supported – you have what you need to do your job well
- Valued – your contributions are recognised and appreciated
- Professional – you're treated with respect as a colleague
- Developmental – you're learning and improving as a teacher
- Sustainable – the work is manageable alongside your PhD
- Positive – overall, the experience is rewarding, not stressful